When Not to Use Next.js
When Not to Use Next.js: Understanding the Limitations
A critical evaluation of scenarios where using Next.js may not align with your project’s goals.
📦 1. Small Static Sites Without Dynamic Needs
Better Alternatives: Simple HTML/CSS, Hugo, Jekyll, or Eleventy.
🔄 2. Real-Time Applications (e.g., Live Chat, Games)
Better Alternatives: Frameworks like Express with Socket.IO, NestJS, or dedicated platforms like Firebase.
📱 3. Native Mobile App Development
Better Alternatives: Use React Native, Flutter, or native iOS/Android SDKs.
🔧 4. Projects Requiring Full Control Over Webpack or Custom Build Setup
Better Alternatives: Use Vite, CRA (Create React App), or manual setups using Webpack.
🚀 5. Backend-Heavy or API-First Applications
Better Alternatives: Use Express.js, NestJS, Spring Boot, or Django for API-driven systems.
🌍 6. Websites Targeting Legacy Browsers or Environments
Better Alternatives: Consider simpler server-rendered apps using PHP, Rails, or ASP.NET MVC when legacy support is a must.
⚙️ 7. SEO Not a Concern
Better Alternatives: React SPA, Vue, or lightweight frameworks like Preact.
🧠 Conclusion
Next.js is an excellent choice for web apps that benefit from SSR, static site generation, and hybrid rendering. However, in cases involving real-time interactions, mobile app development, legacy support, or full backend control, it may not be the right tool. Understanding these boundaries helps you choose the most efficient and appropriate stack for your goals.
Comments
Post a Comment